Tools

Morning-after pill

WASHINGTON (AP) - Women's groups cheered the government's decision to allow 17-year-olds to buy the "morning-after" emergency contraceptive without a doctor's prescription, but conservatives denounced it as a blow to parental supervision of teens.

The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it would accept, not appeal, a federal judge's order that lifts Bush administration restrictions limiting over-the-counter sales of "Plan B" to women 18 and older. U.S. District Judge Edward Korman ruled last month in a lawsuit filed in New York that President George W. Bush's appointees let politics, not science, drive their decision to restrict over-the-counter access.

Women's groups said the FDA's action was long overdue, since the agency's own medical reviewers had initially recommended that the contraceptive be made available without any age restrictions.

Korman ordered the FDA to let 17-year-olds get the birth control pills. He also directed the agency to evaluate clinical data to determine whether all age restrictions should be lifted.

The FDA's latest action does not mean that Plan B will be immediately available to 17-year-olds. The manufacturer must first submit a request.

"It's a good indication that the agency will move expeditiously to ensure its policy on Plan B is based solely on science," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which filed the lawsuit.

Conservatives said politics drove the decision.

"Parents should be furious at the FDA's complete disregard of parental rights and the safety of minors," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America.

Plan B is emergency contraception that contains a high dose of birth control drugs and will not interfere with an established pregnancy. It works by preventing ovulation or fertilization. In medical terms, pregnancy begins when a fertilized egg attaches itself to the wall of the uterus.

If taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, it can reduce a woman's chances of pregnancy by as much as 89 percent.

Monday, Jul 27 at 5:51 PM commonsense wrote ...

if people really become adults at 18, then they need to move out of their parents house on their 18th birthday.. you want them to take responsibility, give them a house payment, car payment

26878314
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Jun 10 at 8:40 PM flgrl wrote ...

oh yeah instead of makeing them deal with the consequences of being irresponsible lets teach them to be irresposible and oh dont worry if they get pregnant they can just murder their unborn child...oh yeah im sure that is a very logical way to go...and while educating them about the situation also educate them about teh consequeses will effect their lives nowaday at 12 we know you have sex and you get pregnant but they cant see the whole picture of how it ruins their lives

23556919
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, May 15 at 9:08 PM Mishrish wrote ...

I scoff at the notion that any 17 year old under any circumstances should be taught a "lesson" of responsibility by not allowing them the RIGHT to these resources. Bringing a human being into the world is WAY more serious than that. Deal with the consequences? PUHLEASE! What kind of logic is that?!!!!

21583014
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friday, May 15 at 9:03 PM Mishfish wrote ...

Wow, the expectations that a 17 year old could possibly raise a child is a little rediculous. Kids make mistakes. Kids cannot raise kids. We already have an alarming amount of needy, undereducated young people trying to raise families on puny minimum wage pay checks. Why add more by refusing our medical resources to teens who are in trouble? Furthermore, what about teens who are raped and did not choose the mistake? Use your brains, people!!!!

21582827
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Monday, May 11 at 7:35 AM MOTHER wrote ...

i AM A MOTHER OF 4 TEENAGE GIRLS AND LET ME SAY THIS!IF THERE GONNA HAVE SEX THERE GONA HAVE SEX NO ONE CAN STOP THEM WE AS PARENTS NEED TO EDUCATE THEM.DONT ECOUGAGE IT BUT EDUCATE I AS A MOTHER HAVE LEARED THAT IF YOU DEAL WITH THESE ON A LEVEL THAT YOU LOOKING AT THEM OR TREATING THEM AS A CHILD THEY ADHEAR TO WHAT YOU ARE TRING TO TELL THEM.OUR RIGHTS AS PARENTS HAVE BEEN LONG GONE FOR A LONG TIKE WE CANNOT DISIPLINE OUR CHILDREN AND THEY KNOW THAT ALL THEY HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL ECT.

21241782
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Sunday, May 3 at 1:41 PM Unbelievable wrote ...

What are the liberals trying to do this country, demoralize it? Sure encourage 17 year old kids to have sex....whatever!

20864296
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, Apr 30 at 9:50 PM FLGRL wrote ...

IF SHE GETS PREGNANT THAN ITS HER FAULT AND SHE SHOULD TAKE RESPOSIBILITY FOR HER ACTIONS...LIKE I SAID BEFORE THERE ARE PLENTY OF WAYS TO KEEP FROM GETTING PREGNANT

20712252
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Thursday, Apr 30 at 8:46 AM a 17 year old wrote ...

if your gunna have sex your gunna have sex. would you rather a 17 year old be pregnate? they should keep the pill at 17.

20661332
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Wednesday, Apr 29 at 8:51 PM FLGRL wrote ...

OK JANELLE IF THEY CANT AFFORD AN ACCIDENT THEN THEY NEED TO TAKE RESPOSIBILTY AND NOT LET THE ACCIDENT HAPPEN THERE ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH WAYS TO KEEP FROM GETTING PREGNANT I THINK THE AGE SHOULD STAY AT 18 BECAUSE 1-THATS WHEN A PERSON LEGALLY BECOMES AND ADULT UNTIL THEN THEY ARE STILL UNDER THEIR PARENTS AND 2-I THINK THIS IS JUST ANOTHER WAY OF SAY OK GO AHEAD AND BE CARELESS IF AN ACCIDENT HAPPENS ITS OK KIDS THESE DAYS NEED TO BE TAUGHT HOW TO BE RESPONSIBLE AND DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES

20640528
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Monday, Apr 27 at 9:15 AM Janelle wrote ...

I believe this is is a wonderful idea to allow 17 year olds to be able to obtain this contraceptive. There are too many young women out there who can't afford an "accident". This drug provides back up to the unfortunate women who made the mistake to have sex so young!

20269752
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

WINK News - News, Sports and Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
More On Demand